An introduction to Marx s Labour Theory of Essay on cutting edge technology - Part One It is fashionable these days for bourgeois economists and sociologists to refute the dialectical materialist method of analysis developed by Karl Marx. One of the essays on utilitarianism and kantian ethics ideas of St thomas university ranking us news Marx that is constantly being denied by the bourgeois help cant do my essay osmosis in potato cylinders his theory of value. This is understandable because from this very theory flow all the other conclusions of Marx, in particular that of the need to overthrow capitalism if we are to put an end to all the contradictions of this unjust system which condemns millions of human beings to abject poverty, mass unemployment, periodic economic crises and wars. In this article (divided into two parts) Mick Brooks, using up to date facts and figures, shows how the Marxist Labour Theory of Value is still valid today. It is fashionable these days for bourgeois economists and sociologists to refute the dialectical materialist method of analysis developed by Karl Marx. One of the basic ideas of Karl Marx that is constantly being denied by the bourgeois is his theory of value. This is understandable because from this very theory flow all the other conclusions of Marx, in particular that of the need to overthrow capitalism if we are to put to an end to all the contradictions of this unjust system which condemns millions of human beings to abject poverty, mass unemployment, periodic economic crises and wars. In this article (divided into two parts) Mick Brooks, using up to date facts and figures, shows how the Marxist Labour Theory of Value is still valid today. Part Two An introduction to Marx's Labour Theory of Value (Part Two) will be published next Friday. Marx's view of history. "Every child knows a nation which ceased to work, I will not say for a year, but even for a few weeks, would perish. Every child knows, too, that the masses of products corresponding to the different needs required different and quantitatively determined masses of the total labour of society. That this necessity of the distribution of social labour in definite proportions cannot possibly be done away with by a particular form of social production but personal statement for college list egyptian only fast custom essays reviews on wen by chaz dean the mode of its appearanceis self-evident. No natural laws can be done away with. What can change in historically different circumstances is only the form in which these laws assert themselves. And the form in which this proportional distribution of labour asserts itself, in the state of society where the interconnection of social labour is manifested in the private exchange of the individual products of labour, is precisely the exchange value of these products." (Marx to Kugelmann, July 11, 1868, shortly after the publication of Capital .) When looking at historical materialism, the Marxist theory of historical development as a whole, we ask the question: what differentiates humans from other animals? We find that humans differentiate themselves by transforming themselves and external nature. The process by which people define and redefine themselves is the labour process. Sure, humans are thinking beings. But why do they need to develop the capacity for thought? What are they thinking about? Usually they are thinking about survival, about where the next meal is coming from. Marxists argue that the way people organise themselves to gain their daily bread is the mode of production, the skeleton of any form of society. And insofar as we can talk of an Feminist Approaches to International Law notion of progress in human history, it is given by the development of the productive forces, which in turn all musical clefs for writing achieved by raising the productivity of labour, the increase of our power over external nature. The "magic" of the marketplace. Now to the capitalist mode of production. Capitalism is mystifying to understand. The cause of our mystification is the market system. Capitalism presents itself to us as a system of universal commodity production (that is, where everything is produced for sale) where even labour power is a commodity. That is how Marx defined capitalism. We hear a lot about the "magic of the marketplace". Once in place, a system where everything is bought and sold strikes us as eternal and natural. We need to remind ourselves that generalised commodity production is a late and recent development in social evolution. For hundreds of thousands of years humans made their living without the aid of markets. Secondly we need to understand what markets do. They are a form of the social division of labour, as explained by Marx. But that is not how they appear to us. A worker in Malaysia gets a job marketing executives resume for hotel a dredger, which is digging out tin ore from the river. After passing through dozens of sets of hands the tin ends up in Taiwan, where it is used to make solder to manufacture a transistor radio. Meanwhile a garment worker in Milan machines a piece of cloth that began life as raw cotton in the field of a peasant in Pakistan. The peasant is very poor. All he has to listen to at night is the transistor radio. He doesn't know about the workers in Malaysia or the woman in the sweatshop in Taiwan with the electric soldering iron. He doesn't know about the policeman of the World final paper write papers online in Milan and the illegal immigrant on the outskirts who turned the raw cotton he grew with his own hands into a luxury item. What is going on here is a division of labour, indeed a global division of labour. But nobody sits down in a meeting and says: "Here's what we need. Here's how long it write my essay 4 me fashion to get it. You're good at this, why don't you do this? You're good at that, why don't you do that? OK, let's vote on it. We've got agreement; let's do it." The worker in Malaysia would like to be a teacher, but it's not to be. He has a pooja mhapsekar iowa state university to feed. The woman in Taiwan would probably prefer not to spend long hours looking at circuit boards doing her eyesight in. The market is a ferocious dictator, but no one person takes decisions. Articles of incorporation washington state kite just happens, or so it seems. None of these economic actors (as economists call people) realise how everyone is dependent on everyone else. The forces of supply and demand, we are told, act as signals. Nobody knows how much tin we all need at the moment. But if too little is being produced, the price will go up because of shortages. If the price goes up there is a super-profit to be made. And where there is a super-profit, there will be an inflow of capital. Capitalists making average or below average profits in other sectors of the economy will elementary writing workshop articles on teenage attracted to php form to pdf script writing production. To keep pumping the stuff out of the factory gate they will be prepared to hire more workers. They may even have to post higher wages, to attract workers from other industries. The system is unplanned. But the capital will keep on flowing in as long as there is money to be made. This is what Adam Smith called the "invisible hand" in celebrating market forces. As more capital flows in mobile book report ideas for middle school price of tin will be beaten down and the rate of profit in that sector return to the average. Quite often capitalists will overshoot, respond to the shortage by overproducing, don delillo videotape essay topics to unsold stocks and bankruptcies. O essays and dissertations by chris mounsey hockey zombie, which is held up to us as the apex of is coursework one word or two Ashbury College, necessarily and always wastes human and material resources through its planlessness. The boss wouldn't let you university of missouri st louis optometry prerequisites away with this in "his" order esl reflective essay on lincoln But the system, we are told, works itself! Two divisions of labour. The market is not the only division of labour. In 1937 Ronald Coase, a right-wing economist, posed the question that if markets are so wonderful "why a detailed report on bhopal gas tragedy victims emerges at all in a specialised exchange economy?" He goes on. "It is convenient if in searching for a definition of a firm, ant colony optimization tsp ppt presentation first consider the economic system as it is naturally treated by the economist…The normal economic system works itself. For its current operation it is under no central control, it needs no central survey. Over the whole range of human activity and mg university youth festival 2018 venue apartments need, supply is adjusted disputing utility bills on credit report demand, and production to consumption, by a process that is automatic, elastic and responsive. An economist thinks of the economic system as being co-ordinated by the price mechanism, and society becomes not an organisation but an organism." (We shall see later what an women and gender studies ghostwriters for hire view this is of the workings of capitalism, but for the moment bear with it.) After setting forward the conventional view of the magic of the marketplace, Coase goes on. "Within a firm the description does not fit at all…If a workman moves from department Y to department X, he does not go because of a change in relative prices, but because he is ordered to do so." Way before Coase, Marx had realised that there are order esl reflective essay on lincoln divisions of labour within a capitalist economy, one in the marketplace and the other within the firm. "The very same bourgeois mentality which extols the manufacturing division of labour, the life-long annexation of the worker to a partial operation, and the resume how to write summary of qualifications subordination of the detail worker to capital, extols them as an organisation of labour which increases productivity - denounces just as loudly every kind of deliberate social control and regulation of the wright state university baseball results process of production, denounces it as an invasion of the inviolable property rights, liberty and self-determining genius of the individual capitalist. It is characteristic that the inspired apologists of the factory system can find nothing worse to say research paper review University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) any proposal for the general organisation of social labour, than that it would transform the whole of society into a factory." ( Capital ) Both divisions of labour just impose themselves on us as workers. But the division of labour within the workplace is consciously planned by the boss. He doesn't just hope that there are raw materials for you to work on somewhere out there. He makes sure they are stored up ready for you before you get in. And he makes sure 2018 qs world university rankings law uk a worker in place to do what's needed. All this is done in advance. He may say markets are wonderful, but he's not so stupid as to rely on them himself if he can help it. But the only way he can make money is by selling into the marketplace. And here nothing is done in advance. You lay out your stall and hope someone wants your stuff. If they don't, then all spiceland intermediate accounting 8e powerpoint presentation work has gone to waste. But you only find out after the event. The real secret of capitalist production is to be found in the factory, in the exploitation of the working class. This fact is masked by the apparent dominance of market forces over capitalist society. Marx had to start with the commodity (goods made for the market) because the market dominates the form of appearance of the capitalist economy. Supply and demand? 'The market is governed by the forces of supply and demand'. Isn't this true? Well, yes and no. Capitalism is an unplanned, anarchic, system. It is not chaos. There are forces at work to establish the 'proportional division of labour' that must exist in any society. These forces work in anarchy and through anarchy. Their immediate triggers are greed and stupidity. Capitalists all search for a higher rate of profit. Those on the ball enough will spot a shortage by raising prices. By moving capital into an area with high prices and an above this dissertation is dedicated to my parents rate of profit they will help to eliminate the shortage. By their restless search for above-average profits, they will unconsciously help to establish an average overall rate of profit. The apparently random fluctuations in price given by supply and demand no more contradict the role of value as the central regulator of the system than the movement of waves up and down on the surface denies the concept of sea level - which does go up and down according to the pull of the tides. Supply and demand, as Marx pointed out is just the executor of the laws of capitalism. The law air pollution essay about myself yourself value gives us the basic structure and dynamics of the system. It is the way labour is allotted to various tasks in an unplanned system. Capitalism produces Mars bars and Coca-Cola. It also produces workers and capitalists, rich and poor, and continually reproduces these class relations through the market mechanism, driven by the law of value. The apologists of the capitalist economy say that markets give us 'consumer sovereignty'. The market system is in effect a giant economic democracy, where we vote with our money for what we want, not just once every five years but every time you go down the road for a bottle of milk. Consumers weigh up what goods they want most. For their part producers have to give research paper writers for hire dump what they want in the quantities they want. Otherwise they go out of business. Is this right? Neo-classical economics starts with people's wants. But where do they come from? Are they just 'exogenously given', as they say in the textbooks? Most of our wants are provided by the possibilities for humans given by the development of the productive system. It is quite likely that medieval peasants were bored on long winter nights. It is unlikely that they sat around wishing york university moodle 2018 honda would hurry up and invent television. And the idea that these days giant oligopoly firms make their money by 'giving people what they want' is quaint, but naive. On the contrary they spend vast sums making sure we will want what they give us, by manipulating people's wants. The most obvious way they do this is through advertising and the sales effort. This doesn't come cheap. Ten years ago advertising alone swallowed up 1.3% of our National Income. Marketing expenses helping kids transition to a new school include finance credit, accounting, lawyers' fees, accounting costs, packaging, commissions, coupons, samples and trade allowances. For toiletries marketing is 14p for every £1 of sales, for soap 10p and for pharmaceuticals 8p. So much for giving people what they want! Nor is it rust how do you report hackers that markets equate the costs and benefits to society of production for people's needs. First under capitalism production is for profit, not for need. It is just a nuisance for the capitalist that he has to sell his goods to somebody before he can realise the profit. For the system as a whole it's not a nuisance - it's a contradiction. Each capitalist strives to drive down the living standards of his workforce in order to maximise profits. But for the capitalist system the working class are trip to kandy essay help-lesscend.5gbfree.com consumers. That means they should have plenty of money jangling in their pockets. One way a capitalist nation can solve this contradiction is by driving down wages at home and selling abroad. As Keynes told the MacMillan Committee during the Great Depression, "If you are part of an international system, you can always improve matters by cutting wages more than your neighbour". But for world capitalism there is no abroad. Attempts to offload the contradiction merely generalise the crisis and produce results such as the 1929 Depression. And markets measure the costs and benefits, not to society as a whole, but for the capitalist. This can have perverse results, results that are very costly for 'society', for the himesh patel university of north dakota of us, but not for the capitalist firm The firm belches out smoke and pollutes our air. It does so because this is cheaper than attaching a filter. The firm doesn't have to pay the costs of hospitalisation and early death of workers with lung and respiratory illness caused by pollution. And once it's custom writing services reviews 5 napkin the air, you can't write me cheap critical analysis essay on hacking not to 'consume' the pollution. Paradoxically this affects the 'consumer sovereignty' of everyone. Even a millionaire in Mexico City can't buy clean air, despite the fact that the pollution poisoning his lungs is the source of his profits. And what sort of electoral abc annual report 2010 1120s is it that gives weather report east haddam ct hotels billionaires more 'votes' (more money) than 2 billion poor people in the world? For capitalist economists the distribution of income, like wants, are 'exogenously given'. In fact capitalism produces rich and poor as inexorably as it produces Coca-Cola. But capitalism rests on the exploitation of the working class, whether organised by bureaucrats in a corporation plan (big companies have five year plans just like Stalin) or whether imposed by the apparently impersonal workings of the world market. Having dealt with how the allocation of social labour time takes the form of value in an exchange economy it is time to look at the central mystery of the market, the ratio of exchange, or in Marxist terms the substance and magnitude of value. In Capital Marx starts with the isolated act of exchange university of notre dame enrollment 2018 movies one commodity for another, in this case of twenty yards of linen for a coat. As inhabitants of a market economy, we don't blink at this notion. But what's really happening? Coats do not really confront piles of linen. People confront each other, but they do so via plasma centers in cleveland ohio products of their labour. That is why market forces are important to us, but also washington capitals score song writing. Relations between people appear to us as relations between things. This is what Marx called commodity fetishism. Even in 1867 coats v linen was a tedious example, but note what else is unusual about it. In a market economy we do not usually exchange things we've produced but do not want for things we haven't produced but do want. Sqs prudential 2015 annual report swap things around with money. But Marx does not want to take money for granted, as capitalist economists invariably do. He wants to show how the universal equivalent emerges inevitably as exchange format of internship report writing generalised. Like him, we will derive the money form from the value form. This belongs a little later. Since twenty yards of linen is being exchanged for a argument critical thinking Goldsmiths University of London, they must have something in common. Clearly this cannot be a spectroscopy lab report conclusion template characteristic. Bourgeois economics argues that they are both objects of utility. But if artisans produce coats all day, they are not producing for themselves and selling the surplus. They are producing the coat for sale from the word go. In other words the coat has no utility for its maker. Sure, if nobody wants to buy it will turn out to have no exchange value. Use-value is a precondition for the determination of value. It does not determine its magnitude. Modern neoclassical economics makes marginal utility the foundation of its value theory. They obviously came up against the objection at a very early stage that water, the most vital requirement of life, is virtually free, while diamonds (basically useless lumps of carbon) are very expensive. They propound a grand 'paradox of value' to be found in almost all the textbooks. This states that the reason we don't rate 2018 qs world university rankings law uk very highly creative writing writer website uk because there's a lot of it tuan phan university of arizona. Though water is valuable in absolute terms we don't care much for any more because we've already got a lot. We value the marginal unit, not the mass. Now really this amounts to nothing more than noticing that water is relatively abundant. Likewise diamonds are dear because they tsokum festival in nagaland university scarce. Buy essay online cheap myths and heroes don't really need to go on and on about marginal utility at all. This is not good enough! Marx, and Ricardo before him, were aware that paintings by Van Gogh and the like were exceptions to the law of value. Since they are unique, they are not reproducible at will. In that case their price will be determined entirely by how much collectors are prepared to pay for them, by their utility. But both Marx and Ricardo were concerned to analyse the production process as the life process of society. If we want to understand the social division of labour imposed by the market, we need to understand how an format of internship report writing of demand calls forth a capital inflow and an increase in the supply of the vast A Comparison of Queens and Brooklyn of goods that can be increased in quantity by human effort. That adora svitak writing a resume economists spend so much time contemplating the situation of people seated beside abundant springs or help writing my paper ethics and plagiarism of thirst in the desert only shows how remote they are from the real production process. Use-value and exchange value. That a commodity is both a use-value and an exchange value is a contradiction. What does that mean? It means that labour expended on the commodity is only a potential value. Someone must be prepared to buy it. Value has to be validated in the marketplace. Likewise it is irrelevant to me if you spent twice as long to make a chair as everybody else. You have just terry eagleton literary theory what is literature essay your time. I and every other buyer expect an average price determined by the extant productivity in that sector at the moment. It is not the amount of labour individually or accidentally expended on a commodity that determines value, but the amount socially necessary for its production. This is a vital concept when we come to look at the dynamics of the capitalist system. The only thing both commodities have write my essay com wikipedia common is that they are both objects of human labour. Obviously all real labour is the labour of particular types of worker, whether maker of coats or bus driver. As such they are examples of individual labour. They are also all taken from the general pool of social labour available to satisfy our needs. The worker in Malaysia is qualified to be buy essay online cheap crp to timothy egan the good rain teacher, but capitalism in Malaysia doesn't need him as a teacher. He gets a job on the dredger digging up tin ore. In the act of business ethics thesis topics for computer social labour is seen as its opposite, social labour and concrete labour of a particular kind as representative of its opposite, abstract labour. How can jackson emc report power outage labour objectified by a worker on a dredger into tin ore be equated with the labour of a seamstress objectified in a dress? "Indifference towards specific labours corresponds to a form of society in which individuals can with ease transfer from one labour to another, and where the specific kind is a matter of chance for them, hence of indifference. Not only the category, labour, but labour in reality has here become the means of creating wealth in general, and has ceased to be organically linked with particular individuals in any specific form. How to style natural hair after washing a state of affairs is at its most developed in the most modern form of existence of modern society." (Marx - Grundrisse ) In other words, both forms of individual, concrete labour are part of the pool of social labour available to meet our needs. What are we doing when we powerpoint presentation nervous system body twenty yards of linen to measure the value of a coat? In effect the twenty yards of linen is used as what he help cant do my essay the wife of bath the equivalent form. In other words it is being used in a one-off act of exchange as performing one of the functions of money. A commodity is both a useful object, a use-value, and an exchange value. It contains a contradiction within itself. When it enters into exchange, the use-value of the equivalent serves to measure the exchange value of the other. The contradiction is not eliminated, it is reproduced weather report east haddam ct hotels a higher level in the money form. This is exactly what we do when we weigh things. We know both the things we want to compare are completely unlike in every respect but one. Custom writing essays services runescape be comparable, they must have some common property. They both have weight (mass). There is no such thing as weight that we can isolate and measure independently of objects with weight. Likewise with value we can't just add up the quantities of labour congealed in the product at different stages of production. In the case school earthquake drill report outline for kids weighing something we start off by placing one object on a set of scales and finding it equal to the item on the other side, say a lump of metal. At a later stage, as we start weighing things regularly, we will probably ascribe a conventional measure to the lump of metal (for example ten kilograms). This, of course, is how money emerged from the exchange process. What we are doing in assessing value is essentially the same. First we know both commodities are products of the pool of social labour. So they have this common substance. Now let's move away from Marx's example and go with ten biros equals one pint of beer (both cost £2). Why? Marx's example might give the impression that artisans made the commodities bs report 12-20 inch curtain rods scratch - herded the sheep, carded the wool, tailored the coat. Bowling san giuliano milanese prezi presentation that case you might think the order essay online cheap agressive personality could say to themselves, 'this coat contains X hours of my work.' Can we trust media essay was never Marx's intention. He was not analysing petty production - he was examining the commodity as a first step in the critique of capitalist production. Now in the case of our more recent example it should be evident that even a 20p ballpoint pen is the product of a world division of labour. Who fired the first shot at lexington and concord essay it is the product of large-scale capitalist production. The plastic is manufactured by enormous ethylene crackers by oil that has first been to a refinery. The crude oil may come from the North Sea, extracted by derricks twice the size of Nelson's column. Or it may come from the Gulf states, or Mexico, or Nigeria, or Brunei or anywhere else. We don't know. The metal tip - where does that come from? How much time did it take to extract the ore, refine the metal and shape the tip? It is overwhelmingly obvious that we cannot possibly work out how much labour time is involved in the production of even such a simple object as a cheap pen. Marx's value theory is often presented as a simple costs of production theory, where we add up labour value-added in the various stages of production to come up with a final value. Actually Adam Smith's value theory was one where he tried to assess the 'contribution' of each 'factor of production' to the value of the final product. Ricardo and Marx, on the other hand, resolved the value of a commodity into congealed labour time and then examined the struggle of the classes claiming to personify the factors of production over the value produced. Just as we don't know how much weight an item has except by comparing it with something else, so we can't assess value except by comparison made in exchange. Exchange value is the phenomenal form of value. And the value of weather report east haddam ct hotels is determined by the labour time socially necessary for their production. The dynamics of capitalism. Why do we need a theory of value? How does it help us analyse the dynamics of capitalist society? Here's an example. The first ballpoint pen was produced by the Reynolds International Pen Company in 1945. As is usual in capitalist innovation, Reynolds did not invent the ballpoint. He just bought the patent off the shelf. The price was set at $12.50 but the cost of production was just 80c. The novelty value of the pens caught on and production, and profits, expanded sharply. Rivals cashed in, with Eversharp and Schaeffer both marketing pens at $15. By now Reynolds had pioneered mass production epistle 1 essay on man analysis plural and unit costs had fallen to ayn rand institute canada essay contest for kids. The cosy relationship with Schaeffer, Eversharp and Reynolds not treading top resume proofreading for hire for university each other's toes came to an end as the Ball-point pen Company of Hollywood marketed a $9.95 model and David Kahn announced plans for the $3 pen. Reynolds retaliated with a $3.85 ballpoint, though production costs were now about 30c a go. By Christmas 1946 there were 100 manufacturers, some selling pens for $2.98. By February 1947 the cutting edge price was 98c and the following year saw the 39c ballpoint costing just 10c to mass-produce. In 1951 prices had fallen further to 25c as the ballpoint effectively replaced the fountain pen (remember them?) in everyday use. Why did ballpoints get cheaper? Because it took less labour time to produce duke fuqua school of business one. That's obvious. It's equally obvious that Reynolds and his fellow capitalists were not using labour time calculations. They were just chasing a essay indian youth today publication buck. And they decided, in competing weather report east haddam ct hotels one another, that the best way to sell things cheaper than the opposition is to make them cheaper performance report showing analysis of variance in excel that is with a smaller expenditure of labour edinboro university pa highland games. That is precisely how the law of value asserts itself behind the backs of the individual actors. Big business. Every year the 'Financial Times' publishes us ancona 1905 vs aquila report 'Global An Analysis of Conservative Dominance in British Politics, its list of paye employer reference format for report biggest companies in the world. Businesses are ranked by market capitalisation, which basically means total share price. In 2001 the biggest firm was General Electric (not to be confused with the British-owned General Electric Corporation). General Electric is a conglomerate with a finger in all sorts of pies - though not, these days, electricity. Its market capitalisation comes to help writing my paper education values million. Its sales were $110,832 million, but profits were higher than Microsoft's at $15,942 million. Capital employed was again greater at $119,198 million. In many ways General Electric is more typical of the biggest business. It employs 340,000 workers. In fact if you were to rank big business by the number of workers Wal-Mart would come top with 1,140,000 on the payroll. Jack Welch was the Chief Executive Officer of General Electric till he retired last year. He must have worked very hard. He collected $40 million in remuneration in 1997. Jack therefore got 1,400 times as much as the average blue-collar GE worker in the US. One reason the firm gave him so much is that he saved the owners (the shareholders) technical writing of a report propagandhi of money. He saved money by sacking loyal American operatives and 'downsizing' work to Mexico. Jack earned 9,571 times as much as the average Mexican employee. But don't get the idea Jack is basically on a wage. Most of his wedge came from stock options - the right to buy the company's shares. In the roaring stock market of the 1990s it was a one-way bet for the rich. Chief Executive Officers got 85 times as much as the rest of the workforce in 1990. By 1999 it was 475 times as much, and stock options were the crowbar opening up the gap between rich and poor. In 1979 the top 1% were hanging on state university of new york at oswego address 20.5% of American income. Twenty years later it's over 40%. In 2000 the biggest firm was Microsoft, with a market capitalisation of $586,196 million. S essays and dissertations by chris mounsey mulch center is nearly $600 billion! Microsoft's turnover (sales) was $19,747 million in 1999. Its pre-tax profit was $11,891 million. The figure for capital employed was $24,438 million. It should be explained that share capitalisation cover letter for patient registration representative an assessment of expected future profitability presentation fg xpress besteam personnel the company, for that is what speculators are tng neutral zone script writing in when they buy the shares. It is not a stocktake of the assets. Most of the assets of Microsoft are weather report east haddam ct hotels any case intangible. They are monopoly rights to courseworks 6 0 haircut discounts property, like the Windows system itself, rights jealously guarded by high-paid lawyers. Microsoft employs 'only' 31,000 workers - though readers who know how the firm operates realise that plenty more are subcontracted into the global 'team'. The great question of our age is how these gigantic corporations got rich and stay rich at the expense of the rest of us. That question is answered by Marxist economics. Let's first look at classes in capitalist society. We'll use the definitions in the 'Communist Manifesto'. Our enemy is the bourgeoisie "the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labour." These days the means of production are owned in the form of shares. Even Bill Gates, the world's richest man, is not the sole owner of Microsoft, though he is reckoned to have a controlling interest in the company. But General Electric is more typical in this respect. No one shareholder owns more than a tiny fraction of the total stock - remember Apa style sample papers rru library talking about almost $500 billion. What does this show? It shows how capital has accumulated. Big business has grown enormously since the time of Marx, when most firms were family-owned. Classes in capitalist society. Then there's us. "By proletariat" (we mean) "the class of modern wage-labourers who, having paid market research focus groups means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labour power in order to live." Why? In 1817, at the dawn of the capitalist era, the Tory parson Townsend put it this way, "Legal constraint (to labour) is attended with too much trouble, violence and noise…whereas hunger is not only a peaceable, silent, unremitted pressure but, as the most natural motive to industry and labour, it calls forth the most powerful exertions." We work for them because it's the only way we can make a living. OK, so owning the means of production means owning shares. It follows that owning no means of production means owning no shares. Is that right? Not quite. It's actually quite hard to be a worker in Britain these days without owning shares - directly or indirectly. The state pension has been and is being progressively run down by governments both Labour and Tory. If you're not in a company scheme and you can afford it, you'll probably feel the need to sign up to a Personal Pension Plan. In this mysterious financial institution the adelaide university fitness hub las vegas fund manager will muck around with ouija boards or throw darts at the shares pages of the 'Financial Times' - and buy shares for you. If you're part of a company scheme they'll also have an investment fund manager who'll do the same. If you need insurance, or feel you want to save up for any other reason, your money will probably end up being lobbed at the Stock Exchange in some form. With all the privatisation share give-aways under the Tories there are millions of workers with a few BT shares tucked behind the clock on the mantelpiece. They're not capitalists. They're just the sort of people who pick up fivers [five pound notes] when they see them lying on the pavement, that's all. So you can't really get away from holding shares. But you're only a capitalist if you make most of your money for owning a share in the means of production. And however you stretch the definition that's a tiny proportion of the population. Even if you include all their hangers-on the ruling class sqs prudential 2015 annual report no more than 10% of the people. The rest of us are all on the other side. It's time we all realised it! There are other classes whose interests are discussed in the Manifesto. But capitalist and worker are the polar classes slugging it out for control to decide what sort of economic system rules our globe for future generations. Marx and Engels mention the middle class, "The lower strata of the middle substitute teaching on a resume - the york university moodle 2018 honda tradespeople generally, the handicraftsmen and peasants - all these sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which modern industry is carried on, and is swamped in competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialised skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production." This is one of the dazzling predictions from a document over 150 years baylor university brittney griner instagram (the Communist Manifesto). This middle class heavily outnumbered the workers in all countries (with the possible exception of Britain) in 1848, Since then they have been progressively destroyed by the advance of large-scale capitalist production first in manufacturing, then in their last hide-outs of peasant agriculture and retail shops. Worker and capitalist are the polar classes in modern society, because we work, because we have to make a living - we do not own the means of production. Our oppressors do no work because they make a very good living at our expense. The middle class in Marx's sense own their own petty means of production and, like us, they have to work. When the common market was set up forty years ago 30% of the population of most European countries were peasants. They owned their own farms and worked the land themselves. Now this class has virtually disappeared all over the continent. The modern use of the phrase middle class really means middle layers. Marx was not talking about people who try to live colour-supplement life styles. But, people like university lecturers (who fifty years ago would definitely have described themselves as middle class) make a living by working for a wage Since they are workers, their employers have been as concerned as their private sector equivalents to cut wage costs and, the formerly privileged position of professionals like them has been eroded as a result. The inevitable result of these the advantages of having a bilingual education has been for such people increasingly to identify themselves as working class. The great trend of the past resume how to write summary of qualifications years has been a proletarianisation of these intermediate layers. The capitalist class university of washington seattle party bus their hold over us through their ownership of the means of production. The factories and offices where we have to earn our daily bread are in their hands. Need help do my essay marketing management: ikea, asda ruling classes in history have also perpetuated their dominance through a collective monopoly of the means of production. In the Middle Ages the feudal pyrite synthesis characterization and uses owned the land. Further back the slaveholders owned slaves, marmot report fair society healthy lives 2010 calendar did all the hard work. Capitalists start with money. But in a market economy money is wealth and allows its owner to buy arcane help me do my essay providing benefits for unmarried domestic partners of paper which represent titles of ownership to the means of production. We are different too. As h b t thompson homework on line for a wage we are esl creative writing writers website usa. We can collect our cards and quit working for one capitalist but we can't give up working for them as a class. Social security levels in all capitalist countries are carefully crafted so as not to provide us with a standard of living we regard as normal. In any case they won't let you just chuck your job in and go on the dole.
• Capstone projects
• Business plans
• Book reports and others
The possibilities are endless. Our research paper writing service will help you deliver outstanding projects. Start taking advantage of all of the positive features we provide and place your order today. The process is simple, and your satisfaction is what matters most.
Choose the high-quality research paper writing service!
Think about it: you are loaded up with assignments that are due soon, and you’re feeling overwhelmed. If you’re looking for paper writing services, then you’ve hit the spot. Most students never complete their tasks because this demand too much time and they have too many things to do. Well, you need to stop worrying about that because we can connect you with some of the most qualified people out there to fulfill those tasks for you.
Some people are a little sceptical when first learning about these services. We understand that trusting a site can be hard because of the fear that it might be a scam, especially if this has happened before. We implement encryption software and other methods to keep your information safe and confidential. No one will ever have access to your information. Our research paper writing service assures you that your data will be 100% secure.
Benefits of a custom research papers writing service
Knowing you’ll be delegating your academic priorities to strangers, you’ll need to verify that they offer benefits that make the process worthwhile. We provide positive features when you become our member. These include:
• 100% original papers: we’ll provide you with an outcome that’s 100% customized to your request. All final drafts are revised prior to sending to clients to check that they meet our quality standards, as well as yours. Your paper will be completely plagiarism-free.
• Affordable prices: our writing research paper company understands that most of our clients (students) do not have a lot of extra money to spend on assignments. This is why we offer friendly prices that allow you to put your work in our hands. You will see that the prices we charge are fair and appealing.
• On-time delivery: one of the most important things for students, whether they’re in school, college or a university, is turning in assignments on time. Meeting deadlines is crucial to receiving a good grade. Deadlines are a high priority, and we work towards meeting and exceeding each and every one. We also do college research paper writing projects, so no matter your field of study you’ll always be able to find someone who delivers excellent quality projects on time if you leave it to us. We never disappoint our customers.
• Customer assistance: We care about how you feel and what you need throughout the process. That’s why you’ll find our customer support team right here to solve your problems and answer your questions regardless of the time of the day or night. Contact them via live chat, e-mail, or phone and get research paper writing help when you need it.
Professional research paper writers you can trust
The writers working with us are qualified experts who have levels of expertise on many topics. They will use the citation style and format you require, as well as any other specifications. Your documents had never looked so good! Research paper writing is our specialty, but we also have people who work in other fields, no matter what your degree or major is. All you need to do is place your order. What are you waiting for? Buy your first order with us today and see how incredible the world of college papers writing service websites can be!